Disclaimer 1- Most of you know I am a member of the Mormon
Church. So, if while reading this, you find references to church practices and
policies that don’t quite make sense, I apologize in advance.
Disclaimer 2- My views are definitely not the views of the
Mormon Church. I in no way claim to make statements, true or false, on behalf
of (or even in true representation of) the church.
On Sunday, we had a combined meeting for the 2nd and 3rd hours of the church block
(Yeah, that’s right, 3 hour church. Come at me, bro). The purpose was to meet
together and listen to presentations from local leaders about the church’s
stance toward homosexuality and gay marriage.
Before we go further, there are a couple things I should
explain. The first is you should know I am in favor of legalizing same sex
marriages. Actually, that’s number 2 on my list of marriage definition options.
The number 1 item would be to simply abolish the term “marriage” from the
United States government’s control, issue civil partnerships/unions, and turn
marriage into a private institution managed by churches as they see fit. Until
that day, I am in support of making gay marriage legal.
The second thing you need to know is that the Mormon Church
currently does not support the legalization of same sex marriage. I say
currently because one of the perks of Mormonism is the belief in modern day
prophets and continued revelation. This belief becomes especially helpful
nowadays, since guys like Moses never laid out guidance in regards to internet
use. Instead, current prophets have the ability to access God’s Will on some of
the more modern issues we face.
Slow down. I don’t want this to become a debate on the validity
of Mormonism, I am just laying out the facts of what Mormons believe
so you understand why I use the term “currently” to explain the Mormon Church’s
stance on the issue at hand. I know all the things you want to say about
Mormons. But that’s not here. No matter how false or misguided you think they
are, you can’t deny that Mormons exist and have beliefs, right?
Anyway, so, let’s review.
1. I, a Mormon, support same sex marriage
2. The Mormon Church does not support same sex marriage.
Now that you know those two important points, you can probably
get a sense for my state of mind during the 2 hour meeting on homosexuality. I
felt like George Bush at a Portland Farmer’s Market.
The meeting was very thoughtful, well planned, and carefully
kind toward those attracted to members of their own sex. We were instructed
well on showing love-but-not-loving, trying to support-without-supporting and
being tolerant-without-tolerating same sex attraction.
The first presenter is a counselor and talked about her
experiences working with members of the church with same-sex attraction. She
talked about facing the pain, sorrow, guilt and loneliness experienced through
feeling like a sinner under God’s law while “fighting” the temptations they
feel toward members of their same gender. She painted a pretty bleak
picture for these folks, talking about strange words like “recovery” and
“rehabilitation” and even “Suicide.”
I say it was strange to hear those words basically because of
the feelings I have toward my wife. Sorry, let me explain. I know
the way I feel about her, the love and companionship and friendship we share. Not
only do I like being around her, I can’t picture my life without her. If the
church were to insist that my feelings toward her were not only wrong but
against God’s will, I would not be interested in Recovering from some sort of
affliction, or going through any type of Rehab…instead, I would question God’s
will and His creation of me.
After the effect those terms had on me, I started paying
attention to some of the other words being used. The common way to refer to the
topic of discussion was that there are people “struggling with same sex
attraction.” At first I didn’t pick up on some of the nuances, but the more I
heard it, honestly, the more it impacted me. Let me break it down into two
parts:
Struggling With-- To
struggle with something means to contend with a task or a problem. For
instance, you could say the neighbor who is going through foreclosure is “struggling
with his finances.” Meaning, if he made some changes and worked to fix his problems,
his finances would not be such a detriment to his success. The point of saying
someone is struggling with something is essentially this: there is a problem that
must be overcome; a problem that can be fixed or solved.
So when we say someone is struggling with homosexuality, isn't it
divisive? Aren't we immediately asserting that there is something inherently wrong
with a person that needs a fix we think is fixable simply because we don’t feel
the same way as they do?
Flip it around for a minute. Can you imagine someone accusing
you of struggling with opposite sex attraction? Can you force yourself to stop
being attracted to the opposite sex and start doing the “right” thing and be
gay? I doubt any of us who identify as straight even have the slightest idea
how offensive and polarizing it is to make such claims.
If you are a staunch Mormon opposed to my views, you might
respond with something along the lines of “everyone faces different
temptations, this is theirs.” I think that is too unfair to our biological construction.
Adam and Eve were commanded to multiply. So great was this
commandment (or perhaps, this intrinsic need to perpetuate the species and
continue evolving) that our desire for sexual intercourse is among the
strongest and most natural of our many senses. Using the “some people face
alcoholism, some people face gambling addictions and some people face
homosexuality” defense is as foolish as saying “some people eat fish, some
people eat tacos, and some people live under water.”
The point being: you can control what you eat (tacos, chicken)
but no matter who tells you what is “right” and “natural,” you simply cannot go
stick your head under water and start taking deep breaths. Let’s stop telling
our gay friends to dunk their heads and inhale. They’re drowning.
Same-Sex Attraction- The
second half of the sentence is more subtle. I’m not sure why there’s this recent
turning away from using terms like “gay” or “lesbian”, but I would guess it has
something to do with creating specific groups. It is very clever, but also very
loving from leaders of the Church whose hearts truly break for those they may
see as lost.
If instead of referring to black people as “black” and white
people as “white,” and replaced those terms with a scale of skin pigmentation,
wouldn’t that take away from people identifying with their own racial groups
(and stereotypes)?
Consider this statement about Russell Wilson: “He is a great
young rookie quarterback from Wisconsin who shows poise in the pocket, high
football IQ and good decision making. He comes from a family where his dad and
uncle are both successful lawyers. His mom has bright blond hair, but he has
his dad’s darker complexion and hazel eyes. He is smaller and scrawnier than
most NFL QB’s, but he makes up for that by studying hours of game film and
working on his release to get the same height as QB’s five inches taller than
him.”
Do you think differently of Russell Wilson than if I were to simply
say he is a black quarterback? Do you immediately picture someone fast and
nimble, with less accuracy on the pass but with dangerous foot speed that can
get quick first downs?
I do. And it’s because branding him as black causes me to
immediately identify who he is. He is black. He is a black man, and will always
be a black man. You don’t change your race. Black people don’t go to rehab and
come out white. They don’t spend time in central Idaho recovering from their
de-blacking.
By using the term “same-sex attraction,” the Church and others
are doing essentially the same thing. We are not identifying a person as “gay,”
because that could mean they were and always will be gay. Instead, we talk
about it as if they are going through a faze where they are confused as to what
they are actually attracted to and we can get to work de-gaying them.
Perhaps the argument to this point is “But Doug, people are born
black and we know why they are black. We can accurately predict the race of
99.99% of children being born. There is no evidence that people are born gay,
and God would not create a gay person.”
My only response to that line of thinking is “Yes there is, and
yes He did.” I mean, my little girls are already showing recognition of the
differences between boys and girls, and they are seven and three! The 7-year
old is a little boy crazy. You want to tell me she is consciously choosing to
like boys not girls?
The same holds true the other way, folks. I grew up with someone
(I won’t say his name, but we are Facebook friends), and he has been gay since
the day I first met him. Do you think I was surprised when he came out after
high school? Do you think he held off on making that choice until after
graduation? Please.
Another topic brought up in the meeting was the correlation
between childhood sexual abuse and homosexuality. Look, I am in no way going to
deny that there are certainly deep and long lasting psychological effects on
abused children, but it is ridiculous (and sort of morbid) to use abuse as
homosexuality’s scapegoat. It is an absurd concept, because it creates an
absurd paradox. If being sexually abused as a child causes someone to be gay,
then all gay people were sexually abused as children. Since this is not the
case, the child abuse theory does not have a case.
So after the first 45-minutes of an hour and a half meeting, we
discussed (without resolution) the question, “What is same-sex attraction?”
The second half of the meeting was spent discussing the Mormon
Church’s support of programs that encourage traditional definitions of family.
By “traditional” I mean the definition of family in America between 1980 and
1995. That is to say, we made no mention of how families are defined in other
countries around the world in regards to plural marriage. We also avoided
defining families before 1978 when only man and wife of the same race were safe
to be married, and we certainly made no mention of plural marriage in America
(or in the Church) before the turn of the 20th Century.
How quickly history can erase itself if we give it enough of a
shove. Only a hundred or so years ago were we Mormons the ones causing national
unrest for our perversion of the US definition of marriage. It seems we would
have a softer heart toward those going down the same road we traveled so many
years ago. We boldly sing the rousing lyrics to “Come, Come Ye Saints” but I
guess we do it selfishly, with only our pioneers of old as deserving of the
retroactive musical encouragement.
Anyway, we were instructed that the legalization of gay marriage
in this country would eventually lead to the church no longer being able to
perform marriages, because the government would step in and say if we didn't allow gay marriage in our temples, we couldn't do marriage, period.
While I doubt that would actually happen, so what if it did? Did
you know this is the case in many countries around the world? Does a government
recognized temple marriage make the marriage more meaningful? A majority of
Mormons are Republicans anyway; doesn't this step take us a little further from
government meddling in our lives?
Spare me the outrage of “but Doug, my tax dollars would be going
toward a government that makes normal something I view as an abomination!”
Look, if you can find me a group of people who are happy with 100% of the
government’s use of tax dollars, I will concede this point to you. Until then,
get down from the high horse.
The last thing I will say about our meeting is that it ended
with our Stake President giving some final thoughts. His were the best and most
thoughtful words of the day. His message was the only one I can really take
from the meeting and feel good about, and that is “Love One Another.”
Regardless of beliefs, sexuality or social class, love one another.
He didn't have all the answers. Hopefully, someday he will. I
subscribe to a church that believes that God is yet to reveal many great and
important things pertaining to our existence here on Earth. My hope is that in
the near future, that revelation will come to help provide guidance to this
crazy, divisive and hurtful topic.
Mormons talk a lot about eternal families and eternal truths. I
hope we all remember that we still know practically nothing about any eternal
truths. And someday, when those truths are revealed, I hope we have the courage
to shake off our old prejudices and accept the further knowledge we receive.
One last thing. We Mormons hold the concept of free will
pretty sacred. We believe that part of our plan coming to Earth was more than
having someone set the rules for us and force us to obey. Instead, we believe
our purpose here allows for us all to take into consideration the guidelines
given to us from on high, and make our own choices, right or wrong, about
following those instructions. I support gay marriage not just because I despise
the idea of withholding rights from others. It’s deeper than that. I support
gay marriage because I believe nothing but anger, hate and pain come from
forcing others to act based on my personal beliefs.
Doug,
ReplyDeleteFirst let me just say that I love the way you write and I have always and will always think of you as a person that is way smarter than me. I agree with most of what you said in this blog post. And unfortunately, I use to be a person that thought of homosexuality as a trial similiar to alcoholism. I have since had a change of heart and totally agree that it is insane to compare the two. I can not imagine how it would feel for people to tell me that being in a relationship with my wife was wrong and that I needed to stop being attracted to her or I would go to hell.
I think that I have a pretty strong testimony about the restored church but I also don't think that leaders of the church are perfect. I'm certain that they wouldn't want us to think they are perfect. I mean, am I suppose to believe that blacks weren't able to receive the priesthood until 1978 because God decided to stop being racist? I think we all know that God is not racist, so why not until 1978? Maybe, just maybe the members of the church were racist.
Regarding same sex marriage, I don't know if the prophet will ever receive a revelation that we should support same sex marriage. I would be very happy if they do, because it seems to me that it would be a good thing, and bring a lot of peace to some members of our faith that are homosexual.
However, just because I think that it would be a good thing doesn't mean that I am going to oppose the church and it's current position on the matter.
I'm sure that some might call me ignorant, or say that I am following blindly, but I'm a believer that following the prophet and the leaders of the church will bring me and my family the greatest joy, even if their current position might be, wait for it...mistaken. Is it crazy to believe that following the prophet will bring greater blessings even if he's wrong?
Beautiful reply John. Thanks for your thoughts and insight.
ReplyDeleteWonderfully written. I am gay came out at 40. Now am dealing with all this crap promoted by the church. It is hard to express what I experience to all my LDS family and friends. This helps.
ReplyDeleteDoug,
ReplyDeleteFirst off you are very talented writer and I hope that you continue to put your thoughts down in writing. Second while I can't agree with everything you said I thought what you wrote came from the heart and was very well thought out. It really made me think and look at what I really believe. Awesome article. Thanks.
Doug--this is great. I agree completely.
ReplyDeleteThis is so very well written. Thank you! I'm fairly certian my son is gay. He's almost 9. We are a family that accepts who you are, no matter what. We are also active LDS. I pray things will change in the future of the church because right now it means a lot to him, and I would like for it to continue to.
ReplyDeleteDoug, would you consider letting us post this essay at NoMoreStrangers.org? Please contact me at danielparkinson@yahoo.com
ReplyDelete